In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Skip to main content

Georgia Statement

Team Georgia Connection




 
In this issue:
 
Direct Deposit: The Smart Choice
Georgia State Parks for the Holidays
Workforce News Briefs
State employees give $2.7 million to support charities
American Cancer Society Marks Great American Smokeout by Urging States and Cities to Pass Smoke-Free Legislation
Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning
U. S. Department of Labor is cracking down on labor law violations
Fall Happenings
That's the Way it Was in November
Leadership Tips
2010 Annual Enrollment Period At A Glance October 9 – November 10, 2009
Employer bias or ex-employee’s negligence?
HR Humor
GED® Awards Luncheon
Back in the Day” Work Tips
An Open Enrollment Peek at the Department of Community Health State Health Benefit Plan
25th Anniversary Celebration of Capitol Hill Toastmasters
Search:

Leadership Tips

Ain’t Misbehaving

 

Every leader’s dream is to have a team of top performers.  But, some top performers come with bad conduct baggage and will argue that they “ain’t misbehaving. “  The chasm between top performance and misbehaving causes, at the least, heartburn.

 

In many workplaces across America, there are recognizable groups of top performers who are often known for their extreme behavior as well as their excellent business results.   
Their uncivil and out of control behaviors can be catastrophic to the organization.

 

Why is bad behavior tolerated?

 

Many leaders are at a loss as to how to rein in this type of employee.  In fact, some leaders simply decide to avoid or deny that the bad behavior exists, or chalks it up to “that’s just the way he is.”  However, it is critical to risk-management issues to determine why this conduct occurs and how it can be prevented or stopped.  Credible organization structures, effective communication, and a commitment to take action - no matter who the person is - are needed.

 

Unfortunately, improper contact for these employees has been going on for a long time. It is often habitual. Some believe that their bad behavior is a perk to the job. The offenders believe that rules don’t apply to them. They think that by virtue of their value to the organization’s business, they are immune to the rules. Surprisingly, almost all of the other organization’s employees believe the same thing about the offenders. Even those who could rein in these employees, don’t because they are trying not to “rock the boat.” The lower-level employees think their opinions are worthless because of the high performer’s power and prestige. Bad behavior is simply tolerated.

 

Changing bad behavior

 

Changing bad conduct is not easy. It requires the right messenger and the right message. It is interesting that top performers have complex jobs, but what they need to learn to get along with others is simple.  

 

Message.  The right message to these employees is simple and direct: “Don’t make sexual comments.” “Don’t throw things.” “Don’t scream at employees.”  “Don’t bully others.”  “Don’t intentional misrepresent what others say.” These direct instructions tell them that their conduct is unacceptable, it is jeopardizing the organization, and it must change. If it doesn’t, they will be fired. It makes them face the simple fact that their career is on the line. It is their choice.

 

Messenger. Typically, the offender has a huge ego and consequently will only listen to someone with the same clout and professional standing. However, many times the messenger is a respected peer, a superior, or someone who the individual views as credible. 

 

Almost invariably, big shots who misbehave have egos that may be even bigger than their intellects. Some will listen only to those with equal clout and professional standing. Frequently, that messenger is a respected peer, a superior, an individual who is viewed as credible in a different profession, or another key figure such as a corporate board member.

Since they think that rules are for others, they assume that nothing can happen to them. Ultimately, the way to change misbehavior is for everyone to know that the conduct won’t be tolerated no matter who is involved. Actions can range from blunt discussions to corrective discipline, therapeutic interventions and resignation or firing.

 

Source: Workforce Management, Teaching Big Shots to Behave, by Stephen M. Paskoff

PrintPrint this page